Moderator: jpurssey

Hermit wrote:Mr Bill, I do not agree with you that this is works salvation. I think you are taking the "not of works" to an unreasonable and unintended extreme.

Mr. Bill wrote:1. What if I forsake only 99% of my sins? What about 75%? Can I still be a Christian?
Mr. Bill wrote:2. What if I willfully sin after I was saved? Is that proof that I never really repented and therefore was never really saved in the first place?
Mr. Bill wrote:3. What happens if I think I'm forsaking my sins but later realize there's something I didn't realize was a sin and therefore didn't turn from? Was I really saved?
Mr. Comfort wrote:4. How many post-salvation sins can I commit and still claim to be saved?
Mr. Bill wrote:5. Since I don't know what sins I might commit tomorrow (especially because sinful thoughts count as sins), is it possible ever to have assurance that I'm a Christian?
Mr. Bill wrote:Mr. Comfort insists that we turn from and forsake all sin, never to go back to it, and change our lifestyle.

Again, does Mr Comfort say that you must deal with all sins individually to be saved? Does he say one must be sinless to have assurance of salvation?
Does Mr Comfort say that anyone who willfully sins (once) was never really saved?
Mr. Bill wrote:From Excerpt Two, above: "If you repent, turn from all sin, and put your trust in Jesus, God says I will forgive you every sin you've ever committed, and grant you everlasting life.
Mr Bill wrote:I assume that his use of "all" actually means "each and every one." Otherwise he would have used "some" or "most."
Mr Bill wrote:If we're going to turn from our sins in order to try to merit salvation

Hermit wrote:Turning from all sin is not necessarily the same as turning from every sin.
Mr Bill wrote:If we're going to turn from our sins in order to try to merit salvation

Hermit wrote:I am not sure that you are not misrepresenting him in the way you voice his teachings by filtering his position through your own doctrinal framework.
A "works salvation" would be when one keeps all of the commandments or otherwise performs righteous acts in order to live a life which enables God to accept him as righteous - apart from salvation in Christ.
I believe one does need to repent in order to be saved. This is not a work which earns one his salvation. I believe that one who has truly been saved will be forever changed, and never happily continue in sin without concern. I believe that one who has been truly saved will bear fruit which are evidence of the salvation he has received.
Mr Bill wrote:Hermit defined works salvation as righteous living independent of Christ. Hermit seems to be saying that if the works are performed AFTER one is saved, it isn’t really works salvation.
Mr Bill wrote:Ron Shea calls this concept “equivalent to offering God a late-dated check or ‘I.O.U.’ in exchange for salvation. An actual payment in cash is not needed, only a good faith promise or resolution concerning future payment. God is willing to offer eternal life ‘on credit’ as it were so long as the repentant sinner promises a future payment of good works whenever the note comes due.”
Mr Bill wrote:He says that you can be saved now, but if you’re REALLY saved, you will prove it unfailingly by your works.
Mr Bill wrote:His claim of never having willfully sinned after he was saved (FAQ #9) is telling. If he admitted to willful post-salvation sin, he wouldn’t be saved by his own definition!

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest